Thursday 9 May 2013

Tackling part a) questions

You've got to answer 4 part a) questions for the G543 paper, and it's important to get them right because it's a lot easier to get top marks in this part than part b). 

If you're struggling on how to go about it, here's how I answer part a):


  • Is it asking about a theory or research? Some sections don't really have "theories" as such, like the stress subsection, but you'll need a bit of an intro. If they're asking about a theory, it won't hurt to make the last paragraph a bit of a study to help illustrate your point. It's generally what they're looking for.
  • Identify what the question is asking you, and actually answer it. Pre-learned part a)s won't be the most effective way of gaining marks; you need to apply your knowledge of studies and theories to the actual question.  
  • Keep referring back to the question.
Generally, this is my structure:

1. Set the scene. If it's a question on the behavioural approach to managing stress, briefly define stress and outline the assumption of the behaviourist approach. You might also want to list that there are many approaches to managing stress, but it's not necessary. 

e.g. Stress is the body's response to either physical, emotional or mental demands that are perceived to stretch an individual in some way (often because they may feel they are unable to deal with it). Some stress is good, like stress that makes you want to revise, but some stress is unnecessary and has a strong aversive effect on overall health. There are many proposed ways to manage stress. The behavioural approach to psychology believes that all behaviour, including stress is learned, and thus assumes that you can learn to manage stress.

2. The theory. Start with the basic explanation, as simple as you can. Then you can expand on it and show what you know, giving the example of a specific or main theory. 

e.g. The behavioural approach to managing stress often includes teaching stressed clients to be aware of their central nervous system and their stress, and then learning how to reduce the stress. This is often also combined with positive reinforcements. One key behavioural technique of managing stress emphasises the role of biofeedback. It involves being taught relaxation techniques, whilst being made aware of the effect on the body that they have, and then receiving feedback on their progress, through the use of biodots, or heart rate monitors which show the physical reduction of stress. This use of double positive reinforcement in the form of relaxation and biofeedback is supposed to help the client feel in control of their stress.

3. The study. Even if the question doesn't ask for it, I would rarely recommend skipping this step. It helps to illustrate your understanding and get you those full marks.

e.g. One study which illustrates how the behaviourist approach uses biofeedback to manage stress was conducted by Budzynski et al. It was a field experiment involving 18 volunteers with tension headaches who were split into three conditions. Group 1 received relaxation training for 2 weekly sessions for 8 weeks, during which they had their muscle tension measured by an EMG. They were informed of the biofeedback in the form of clicks as their positive reinforcement; more clicks meant higher tension, and thus they were encouraged to relax. Group 2 had the same relaxation training but didn't have accurate biofeedback, and Group 3 was a control group with neither. Both experimental groups showed improvement in tension headaches and other stress-related illnesses such as hysteria and depression, but Group 1 showed the most improvement. This suggests that biofeedback is one technique in which stress can be managed. 

If there's a question you'd like me to go over, leave a comment and I'll take a look. 

36 comments:

  1. Hi, I was the anonymous from before (I don't know why it was anon). I wrote a part A answer including the study like this and she just crossed out the study saying it wasn't needed and gave me 9/10. I don't know what to believe :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 9/10 is a great result so don't be disheartened. What I'd suggest is looking at the mark scheme, as from what I've seen they usually ask for studies. I've been getting full marks from my practices that I've given to my teacher but teachers do vary. If you've got a really comprehensive theory description you mightn't need the illustration using a study, so maybe that's what she meant? And often the last mark is list by not including a concluding sentence explicitly linking to the question, as in the example above. May I ask which question you answered?

      Delete
  2. I think it was about describing the health belief model, and when she marked them we were told not to refer to the study! Do you have a guide to answering part B questions?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ah okay, I see why she's said that. Basically, because the health belief model is a fairly comprehensive theory and it's quite lengthy to explain, the model alone is enough to get you full marks. With some theories, the theory isn't very long or they're a bit tricky to fully explain, so a study can help you illustrate it. Another example of this would be the cognitive interviewing techniques; describing CIT in full probably wouldn't require a study for full marks.

    Essentially, if you feel a study would help to illustrate the theory, then by all means include it, but if you're struggling with timing or the theory is extensive, it's not necessary.

    I hope this makes sense!

    As for the part b), I've got one on how to answer compare questions entitled "Issues and Debates in Psychology: How to answer Compare..." as this is the most common type of question. However, if you'd like me to post about a different type of question or even a specific question, I'll get round to it by tomorrow evening?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Okay, I'll take a look at that! That would be good but please don't do it instead of/in place of other revision just to help me! How may studies have you learnt? I have 66 because they combined the dysfunction booklet with something else to make 12 studies instead of 18, but most people seem to have even less than that! Thanks for all this by the way :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Um tbh I haven't really counted! I have one for most topics, but 6 not 9 for stress, and I have an extra one for dysfunctional behaviour explanations. I'm not doing healthy living or reaching a guilty verdict. Yeah, I'm using mostly the same studies for dysfunctional explanations and treatments and disorder treatments (all are on depression; the extra one is the Little Albert study for phobias).

      The part b) section is up now; I hope it helps! And don't worry about it, I only do as much as I can manage! It helps me consolidate my knowledge, so if it helps anybody out at the same time, I'm pretty chuffed :P

      And you are very welcome! How's revision coming along?

      Delete
  5. We have anxiety (including phobias), affective and psychotic disorders, and the only one we're doing in detail is psychotic disorders (schizophrenia). What do you mean about all yours being on depression, because our treatments are biological (drugs), cognitive (CBT) and behavioural?
    To be honest my revision for EVERYTHING is going terribly, I've done so little and I just can't make myself. I think it's because I have a lack of direction as I'm not going to uni next year as I couldn't pick a subject I liked, and don't even know if I'll ever go, or what I'm doing with my life!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Can you please write a model answer for Turning to crime plz?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. a or b, and what section?

      Delete
    2. part a on criminal thinking patterns - cognition..please
      thanks

      Delete
    3. June 2010
      (a) Outline one piece of research into criminal thinking patterns (10)
      Different approaches in psychology all offer various explanations as to why people turn to crime. The cognitive approach offers several different explanations, including moral development, social cognition, and criminal thinking patterns.
      The cognitive approach itself assumes that behaviour can be explained in terms of differences in cognitions, and that criminals tend to have faulty thinking patterns which cause them to turn to crime. Criminal thinking patterns are one explanation which refers to not only faulty thinking, but assumes that criminality is a personality attribute, characterised by erroneous and distinct distortions in cognition.
      One piece of research into criminal thinking patterns was Yochelson and Samenow’s longitudinal study. The study used a sample of 255 male offenders from psychiatric hospitals in the USA, who had pleaded not guilty on reasons of insanity (NGRI). The researchers used self-report in the form of Freudian-style therapeutic interviews, which asked them about their thoughts and perceptions of crimes and themselves, and aimed to provide some sort of therapy to those who remained in the programme (though there was an extremely high attrition rate).
      The results suggested that there were indeed criminal thinking patterns which differentiate criminals from non-criminals, and that these resulted in their criminal behaviour. Yochelson and Samenow split these thinking patterns into three categories: criminal thinking patterns, crime-related thinking errors, and automatic thinking errors. Criminal thinking patterns were characterised by fear and a need for power and control, automatic thinking errors included denial of blame and responsibility, and crime-related thinking errors consisted of optimistic fantasies of anti-social behaviour, and positive connotations with criminal activity.
      The researchers concluded that criminals are not impulsive and make rational decisions, but these are negatively affected by their criminal thinking errors, of which they found approximately 40.


      This hasn't been marked by a teacher, but is the same amount as I typically write for a part a).

      Delete
  7. Outline one piece of research into disrupted families (10)

    hey for this question...

    is this intro okay?
    Different approaches in psychology all offer various explanations as to why people turn to crime. The influence of upbringing on criminality offers several different explanations, including disrupted families, learning from others and Poverty /disadvantaged neighbourhoods. The disrupted families---

    i dont know what write after that for the intro..could you please help me thanks

    ReplyDelete
  8. Outline one piece of research into disrupted families (10)
    Different approaches in psychology all offer various explanations as to why people turn to crime. The influence of upbringing on criminality offers several different explanations, including disrupted families, learning from others and Poverty /disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Farrington proposed on upbringing theory to why people turn to crime by explaining the role of disrupted families.
    He aimed to document the start, duration and end of offending behaviour in families. His study was a longitudinal survey, 411 boys were followed from the age of 8 to 40 in interviews and via their criminal records. The boys were predominately white working class families. Interviews and questionnaires were completed by teachers. The results show that at age 48, of 404 individuals searched on the criminal records; 161 had convictions. The most important childhood risk factors for later offending are family, criminality, poor parenting, poverty and poor school attainment. Also, 7 % of the chronic offenders shared common characteristics such as young mother, delinquent sibling, high daring and low popularity. Farrington claimed that conviction of one family member can strongly associate with conviction of another family member which suggests that being brought up in a criminal family can lead somebody to commit crime. However, early intervention programmes must be targeted on under 10 years old to reduce offending in later life. Moreover, other factors need to be established such as cognition and biology to suggest why a person may turn to crime.

    just wrote this essay, this is worth alteast 7-8 marks?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah I would say so. The introduction is great, it sets the context for the question well.

      To gain a couple more marks, I'd make sure you mention that the methodology also included gathering data from police records, and self-report from the boys and their families. The results are in a good amount of depth.

      You've started to evaluate the study in the last section from "However.." which won't get you marks, so if I were you, I'd do a sentence like "Thus, one piece of research into disrupted families was the longitudinal research conducted by Juby and Farrington on 411 boys from London, which found that various characteristics of a disrupted family such as absent parents and high conflict correlated with criminalities."

      I'd say this was between 7 and 8 marks. A sentence or two on what the disrupted families theory is at the beginning would increase that to a strong 8 or 9 out of 10.

      Delete
    2. so instead of this sentence ''However, early intervention programmes must be targeted on under 10 years old to reduce offending in later life.''

      would it be better to wwrite that ''Thus, one piece of research into disrupted families was the longitudinal research conducted by Juby and Farrington on 411 boys from London, which found that various characteristics of a disrupted family such as absent parents and high conflict correlated with criminalities."
      coz in the book, it says the conclusion is about having early interventions

      so im confused

      Delete
    3. Ideally include both, but linking back to the question is really important.

      Delete
  9. could you please write a model answer for part a on interviewin suspect
    on detecting lies. please
    thank you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (a) Describe one piece of research into how lies can be detected when suspects are interviewed (10)

      Interviewing suspects has the primary purpose of gathering enough evidence in order to convict or release individuals who have been brought in for questioning. Thus, it is important that the evidence gathered is of good quality, and that misinformation is picked up on.

      Detectives tend to think that they are good at detecting lies, but the extent to which this is true is debatable. Detection of lies tends to rely on experience, and noticing "cues".

      One piece of research into detecting lies was conducted by Mann et al (2004). It was a laboratory experiment involving 99 experienced police officers from Kent, in the UK. They were shown 54 video clips of information being given by real suspects during actual police interviews, and asked to determine whether the suspect was telling the truth or lying in each clip. They were also asked to make a note of the cues they used to come to that conclusion.

      The results showed that police officers performed better than at chance level (50%) at 66% accurate for detecting lies, and 63% accurate for detecting truthful information. There were a variety of cues given, including gaze, fidgeting, general body language, contradicting statements and vagueness.

      Thus, Mann et al's research into the accuracy of police officers' detection of lies and the cues they use to help them is one example of research into how lies can be detected.

      Delete
  10. heyya!
    if yu dont mind, could you do a model answer for cognitive skills programme
    thanks a lot

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haven't had one marked but I'll write one based on the method that I've used on past full mark part a) questions. It'll be up sometime tomorrow or Saturday.

      Delete
    2. http://ocra2psychologyg543.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/part-for-cognitive-skills-programmes.html

      Delete
  11. 'Outline how brain dysfunction can explain criminal behaviour'

    please help me on this question! I really don't understand the study by Raine et al, what would you include in your answer for this question?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey there! I completely understand your confusion about Raine - before I started revision, it was my least favorite study!

      Essentially, brain dysfunction theory is the idea that criminals commit crimes because they have damage or dysfunction in areas of the brain that cause them to act in that way. Most tend to refer to the pre-frontal cortex, which is responsible for executive function such as decision making and inhibitions/self-control. Often, they might refer to abnormalities in the limbic system, which contains the amygdala (responsible for emotional regulation) and hippocampus (responsible for memory and learning). People with damage or dysfunction in the limbic system or in the pre-frontal cortex therefore may act in a criminal way because they can't control their emotions, they have low self-control, and they don't learn from experience.

      The study by Raine is explained here:

      http://ocra2psychologyg543.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/brain-dysfunction-theory.html

      Delete
    2. Thank you!

      Delete
  12. Do you recommend doing the exam whilst you're stoned? Because as a heavy cannabis user I often find I get more creative when I'm lean. Is this the sort of exam I could do that with like general studies?

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hi my name is Charlie Hewpitt. I was just wondering if you could help me with this question? I am struggling to answer it without being too research specific; "Compare explanations of the causes of stress." Thanks :) :) :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sure. You could look at to what extent the causes are situational or dispositional, how much research appears to support them and whether they are nomothetic (stressful for most/all people) or idiographic (individual to each person or group).

      Delete
    2. You're the best xxxxx

      Delete
    3. I've also just done this post, which might help you further on stress.
      http://ocra2psychologyg543.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/evaluation-points-for-stress.html

      And you're very kind!

      Delete
  15. Hi there, I was just wondering how you were able to remember the vast amount of data/ information about each study e.g. Sample sizes, dates and so on. I am really struggling with remembering the specific details x

    ReplyDelete
  16. hi could you answer outline evidence which shows that genes may influence criminal behaviour

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hi Vicky, I was wondering could you post a model answer to: outline evidence which shows that genes may influence criminal behaviour.
    Or ar least key points that you think should be included to gain at least 8 marks, rather than just purely talking about the Brunner study

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hi Vicky, I was wondering could you post a model answer to: outline evidence which shows that genes may influence criminal behaviour.
    Or ar least key points that you think should be included to gain at least 8 marks, rather than just purely talking about the Brunner study

    ReplyDelete
  19. Herbal remedy to cure Hsv-1&2, Email R.buckler11@gmail com,,,

    ReplyDelete